Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
7.6 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
9.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 33.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Overall, the process of review was decent, but not excellent. The first reviews took very long to arrive. When they did arrive, two of the reviewers made very minor comments about the paper. Only one of the reviewers commented in detail, which we were very happy to listen to. Ultimately, the paper was accepted without too much difficulty.