Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
4.2 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
13.4 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.5 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.0 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.5 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 10.9 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I felt it was particularly important to post this review because the only other review on this site claims the process took 6 months between each stage of the process. This was not our experience. The time it took to receive these results was comparable to most other journals in our field, about 2.5 months from submission to initial decision. We received highly thorough and fair feedback from the reviewers and the editors that will be useful in considering how to revise the manuscript for other venues.