Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.0 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.0 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 13.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The process for submission was smooth, and early communication with journal assistants was helpful. The eventual reviews spanned a range from accept to revise to reject. The final decision made was rejection, but the reject opinion showed signs of careless reading the submission (in particular, recommending the inclusion of scholarship already cited at multiple points in the submission). This was pointed out to the Editors following the reject decision, in an email that also thanked other reviewers for their careful and constructive feedback. There was no reply from the Editors.