Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 11.9 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
Refereeing process was fast, but referee's report was awful. Five lines of report showing that the referee has neither read nor understood the paper at all. S/he said we were working on metric measure spaces, while literally in the abstract it was written "throughout the paper the measure space will never be asked to be metric".
3.1
Good process
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines