Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.7 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
7.9 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
3.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
2.0 / 5.0 (easy)
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 16.0 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Editor was balanced and appreciative. Quality of review reports was reasonable. The editor apologised for the difficulty in finding reviewers (one or more who agreed to review did not actually return the review reports). Because of that, the process took much longer than their average turnaround times (which they usually report at the beginning of each year in an Editorial).