Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
15.4 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
15.4 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
1.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 67.0 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
It took FoCM more than a year from the date of submission until we received a response from the editor. One reviewer was clearly an expert and wrote a positive review, recommending only smaller changes. The other reviewer, who was very clearly not an expert on the topic and misunderstood several of our results, wrote a negative report. The editor chose to listen to the non-expert.