Latest review
First review round: 16.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good).
Outcome: Rejected.
Motivation:
The editorial office did every executive affairs in a good way. However, the quality of reviewer comments were really questionable.
Two reviews were sent to me, one of them was accurate and helpful. However, the other one was very short and vague. He/she advised for the rejection, while it was clear that he/she did not even read all parts of the manuscript.