Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.6 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
6.0 months
Decision time immediate rejection
15 days
Average number of review rounds
3.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 11.3 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The first time the AE comlpetely missed the novelties. then i was assigned a reviewer who hardly wrote in English and asked generic questions (e.g. I wonder if the two methods are different, of course they were) or would just not understand and ask for clarifications. In the three rounds of reviewing one referee never acknowledged I had answered his/er previous comments, but would just come up with new meaningless requests. I found it totally unethical to let a referee just argue for the sake of not making a paper published. The other referee said it was ok after the second review.