Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.6 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
2.3 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.5 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.5 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 12.4 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Overall, we are happy with the review process: the reviewers that examine our paper took their time and made a detailed and knowledgeable review that [we think] improved our work. The only annoying thing about the review process was the initial waiting time. We waited for 16 weeks for the first round, while in the second one it was only 5 weeks. But again, in general, it was a good process.
4.5
Excellent process
2 reviews
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Neuroscience

Related journals

Neuron The EMBO Journal Trends in Neurosciences